Rogers: Counting their Way to Success with the iPhone

Rogers came out with their iPhone price plans last week and as you can see they are not starting off on the right foot. I don’t know who is coming up with their price plans for data usage but they clearly don’t get what this phone is all about.573450_65986609v2.jpg

The fact that they still need to explain the data capabilities in terms of “200,000 text e-mails, 3,100 web pages, or 1,360 photo attachments” shows just how much they missed the mark on this one. This type of metric has been floating around for awhile at mobile operators, somehow nearly becoming the standard method for describing data usage. Unfortunately this metric doesn’t really mean anything, in fact it means less than anything – I’d be more inclined to call it false advertising. Aside from the obvious differences in sizes of photos and web pages, this metric has its usefulness anchored in the idea that people are either counting this stuff or that they can correlate this info into a meaningful measure. Since clearly no one walks around counting websites they have visited this seems like more of an excuse to write down some big numbers.

Lessig on Free Culture and Digging for Mistakes

Lawrence Lessig most definitely has a way with words and an exceptional presentation style – I blogged previously about one of his videos in The Bazaar of Spectrum . The video below is a new version of an older speech Lessig did about Free Culture and the impact of copyright law on access (or lack thereof) to culture. The old version was fantastic, and this updated version is even better. As a teaser – stay tuned in the video for some great George W. Bush parody’s.

In addition to the great content around copyright law, another aspect which I found fascinating about this presentation was his analysis of what he considered to be the ‘mistakes’ of their effort in the Eldred v. Ashcroft case. Clearly, the identification of these mistakes was not something that came about easily for them and I believe that throughout our lives this process of ‘mistake identification’ is something that is continually short-changed. It is just way too easy to chalk up some failure to a cause beyond your control, rather than to dig deep into it and find any mistakes or changes in direction that could have been taken that would have led to a completely different outcome.

Filed under: Open Source | No Comments

RIM’s lost opportunity – Instant Messaging?

Years ago, RIM made a very important realization about data on mobile networks – it was dynamic. It came, went, ebbed and flowed with an individual’s movement in and out of tunnels, elevators, and underground parking garages. From this realization they developed devices and a network designed with this understanding at its core. This understanding led to what has been, without question, the most reliable and immediate mobile email delivery mechanism on the market by way of RIM’s often replicated but rarely duplicated ‘push’ service. The RIM push mechanism opened the door for new services to be provided reliably over a naturally unreliable link, however as time passed I believe this stroke of innovation may be slowly entering into the realm of a lost opportunity for RIM.

Instant messaging is an example of a service that suddenly became incredibly reliable on a wireless device because of RIM’s push service. Previously this had been an application so unreliable on a mobile that the typical user experience was to try it once, have a conversation with someone, realize you missed some critical piece of information due to message loss, and then proceed to discard the messaging application. RIM sorted this out, in fact RIM perfected it. You could now go in and out of coverage as frequently and as rapidly as you wanted and be sure that you’d never miss a beat. Conversing through this means suddenly became as reliable as SMS but also as convenient as we have all come to expect from instant messaging. User presence was managed properly, messages were queued, you could tell when messages had been delivered, and you could even know when those you were chatting to were typing – this was, and has remained, an experience unmatched on any other platform to date.

Seemingly the demand for instant messaging on a mobile device is something that has gone largely un-noticed (or perhaps ignored) by handset makers and mobile phone operators. However, as of the Apple WWDC event this may have changed, and with it so too has RIM’s position as the sole provider of such a powerful capability. While details remain scarce it seems as though the Apple push based notification system will maintain a persistent connection with the device and in turn allow for reliable distribution of things like instant messages. There has been no definitive announcement of messaging applications using this system for the iPhone yet, but with the SDK being readied to allow developers access to this service, and ongoing rumours of things like iChat, AIM, and Jabber support as part of the new iPhone OS, it is safe to say that the world of mobile instant messaging is quite likely about to change.

While RIM definitely pioneered the concepts to enable such services as instant messaging to a mobile device they surely never put much emphasis on this unique ability. Apple’s announcement got me thinking how much this could have been an enormous differentiator for the Blackberry. Instant messaging is now used widely in enterprises around the world and the seamless mobile experience offered by the Blackberry platform on Yahoo!, Google Talk and their own Blackberry Messaging had been unmatched. Perhaps a new competitor has now arrived, a new competitor that has realized the value of such functionality and will exploit it as a key product differentiator. Is this another case of being first to market not making any difference?